Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

November 19 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: General Cable Corporation 401(k) / Erisa Lawsuit

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> General Cable Corporation General Cable Corporation BGC 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit General Cable Corporation has been accused of securities fraud. If you are a current or former employee or are a member of any of General Cable Corporation investment Attorney Directory plans or profit sharing retirement plans you may be included in this possible General Cable Corporation 401(k) or Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action. If you purchased or held General Cable Corporation stock in one of those plans during the periods May-3-11 to Oct-14-13, you may have a claim. Under ERISA, General Cable Corporation employees can file a lawsuit against the company for putting stock options at risk. General Cable Corporation employees have a claim if they can prove their employer violated its fiduciary duty to its employees. Fiduciary duty refers to a company's responsibility to the people who invest in it. If an employer puts the company's interest ahead of the investors', it has broken its fiduciary duty. A fiduciary is a person that exercises discretion over the management of plan assets or exercises discretionary control over the administration of the plan. ERISA is a federal law that sets minimum standards for pension and health plans set up by private businesses. ERISA was designed to protect people who participate in employee benefit plans, including employees with stock options in a company. Stock options are a form of compensation in which employees are given the opportunity to purchase shares of the company stock at a certain price. General Cable Corporation 401(k) / ERISA Legal Help If you have suffered from General Cable Corporation 401(k) plan losses, you may qualify for damages or remedies that may be awarded in a possible General Cable Corporation ERISA class action lawsuit. Please click the link below to submit your complaint and we will have a lawyer review your ERISA complaint. If you are NOT a current or former employee of this company, please use this form to register your complaint.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/general-cable-corporation-bgc-securities-erisa.html?ref=rss

November 18 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Vical Incorporated 401(k) / Erisa Lawsuit

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Vical Incorporated Vical Incorporated VICL 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit Vical Incorporated has been accused of securities fraud. If you are a current or former employee or are a member of any of Vical Incorporated investment plans or profit sharing retirement plans you may be included in this possible Vical Incorporated 401(k) or Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action. If you purchased or held Vical Incorporated stock in one of those plans during the periods Feb-8-12 to Aug-12-13, you may have a claim. Under ERISA, Vical Incorporated employees can file a lawsuit against the company for putting stock options at risk. Vical Incorporated employees have a claim if they can prove their employer violated its fiduciary duty to its employees. Fiduciary duty refers to a company's responsibility to the people who invest in it. If an employer puts the company's interest ahead of the investors', it has broken its fiduciary duty. A fiduciary is a person that exercises discretion over the management of plan assets or exercises discretionary control over the administration of the plan. ERISA is a federal law that sets minimum standards for pension and health plans set up by private businesses. ERISA was designed to protect people who participate in employee benefit plans, including employees with stock options in a company. Stock options are a form of compensation in which employees are given the opportunity to purchase shares of the company stock at a certain price. Vical Incorporated 401(k) / ERISA Legal Help If you have suffered from Vical Incorporated 401(k) plan losses, you may qualify for damages or remedies that may be awarded in a possible Vical Incorporated ERISA class action lawsuit. Please click the link below to submit your complaint and we will have a lawyer review your ERISA complaint. If you are NOT a current or former employee of this company, please use this form to register your complaint.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/vical-incorporated-vicl-securities-erisa.html?ref=rss

November 16 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Blackberry Limited 401(k) / Erisa Lawsuit

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> BlackBerry Limited BlackBerry Limited BBRY 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit BlackBerry Limited has been accused of securities fraud. If you are a current or former employee or are a member of any of BlackBerry Limited investment plans or profit sharing retirement plans you may be included in this possible BlackBerry Limited 401(k) or Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action. If you purchased or held BlackBerry Limited stock in one of those plans during the periods Sep-27-12 to Sep-20-13, you may have a claim. Under ERISA, BlackBerry Limited employees can file a lawsuit against the company for putting stock options at risk. BlackBerry Limited employees have a claim if they can prove their employer violated its fiduciary duty to its employees. Attorney Directory Fiduciary duty refers to a company's responsibility to the people who invest in it. If an employer puts the company's interest ahead of the investors', it has broken its fiduciary duty. A fiduciary is a person that exercises discretion over the management of plan assets or exercises discretionary control over the administration of the plan. ERISA is a federal law that sets minimum standards for pension and health plans set up by private businesses. ERISA was designed to protect people who participate in employee benefit plans, including employees with stock options in a company. Stock options are a form of compensation in which employees are given the opportunity to purchase shares of the company stock at a certain price. BlackBerry Limited 401(k) / ERISA Legal Help If you have suffered from BlackBerry Limited 401(k) plan losses, you may qualify for damages or remedies that may be awarded in a possible BlackBerry Limited ERISA class action lawsuit. Please click the link below to submit your complaint and we will have a lawyer review your ERISA complaint. If you are NOT a current or former employee of this company, please use this form to register your complaint.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/blackberry-limited-bbry-securities-erisa.html?ref=rss

November 14 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Vical Incorporated 401(k) / Erisa Lawsuit

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Vical Incorporated Vical Incorporated VICL 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit Vical Incorporated has been accused of securities fraud. If you are a current or former employee or are a member of any of Vical Incorporated investment plans or profit sharing retirement plans you may be included in this possible Vical Incorporated 401(k) or Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action. If you purchased or held Vical Incorporated stock in one of those plans during the periods Feb-8-12 to Aug-12-13, you may have a claim. Under ERISA, Vical Incorporated employees can file a lawsuit against the company for putting stock options at risk. Vical Incorporated employees have a claim if they can prove their employer violated its fiduciary duty to its employees. Fiduciary duty refers to a company's responsibility to the people who invest in it. If an employer puts the company's interest ahead of the investors', it has broken its fiduciary duty. A fiduciary is a person that exercises discretion over the management of plan assets or exercises discretionary control over the administration of the plan. ERISA is a federal law that sets minimum standards for pension and health plans set up by private businesses. ERISA was designed to protect people who participate in employee benefit plans, including employees with stock options in a company. Stock options are a form of compensation in which employees are given the opportunity to purchase shares of the company stock at a certain price. Vical Incorporated 401(k) / ERISA Legal Help If you have suffered from Vical Incorporated 401(k) plan losses, you may qualify for damages or remedies that may be awarded in a possible Vical Incorporated ERISA class action lawsuit. Please click the link below to submit your complaint and we will have a lawyer review your ERISA complaint.If you are NOT a current or former employee of this company, please use this form to register your complaint. Thank you.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/vical-incorporated-vicl-securities-erisa.html?ref=rss

November 12 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Nuvasive Inc, 401(k) / Erisa Lawsuit

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> NuVasive Inc, NuVasive Inc, NUVA 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit NuVasive Inc, has been accused of securities fraud. If you are a current or former employee or are a member of any of NuVasive Inc, investment plans or profit sharing retirement plans you may be included in this possible NuVasive Inc, 401(k) or Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action. If you purchased or held NuVasive Inc, stock in one of those http://www.yourstatelaws.info/145-time-what-would-you-do-with-it plans during the periods Oct-22-08 to Jul-30-13, you may have a claim. Under ERISA, NuVasive Inc, employees can file a lawsuit against the company for putting stock options at risk. NuVasive Inc, employees have a claim if they can prove their employer violated its fiduciary duty to its employees. Fiduciary duty refers to a company's responsibility to the people who invest in it. If an employer puts the company's interest ahead of the investors', it has broken its fiduciary duty. A fiduciary is a person that exercises discretion over the management of plan assets or exercises discretionary control over the administration of the plan. ERISA is a federal law that sets minimum standards for pension and health plans set up by private businesses. ERISA was designed to protect people who participate in employee benefit plans, including employees with stock options in a company. Stock options are a form of compensation in which employees are given the opportunity to purchase shares of the company stock at a certain price. NuVasive Inc, 401(k) / ERISA Legal Help If you have suffered from NuVasive Inc, 401(k) plan losses, you may qualify for damages or remedies that may be awarded in a possible NuVasive Inc, ERISA class action lawsuit. Please click the link below to submit your complaint and we will have a lawyer review your ERISA complaint.If you are NOT a current or former employee of this company, please use this form to register your complaint. Thank you.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/nuvasive-inc-nuva-securities-erisa.html?ref=rss

November 10 2013

cornellncwd

Settlement: Conagra And Alexia Settle Alexia Potato Products Consumer Fraud Lawsuit For A Proposed $2.5m

BLOG What are you looking for? Home Page >> Settlements >> ConAgra and Alexia Settle Alexia Potato Products Consumer Fraud Lawsuit for a Proposed $2.5M ConAgra and Alexia Settle Alexia Potato Products Consumer Fraud Lawsuit for a Proposed $2.5M New York, NY: A preliminary settlement has been reached in a consumer fraud class action lawsuit pending against ConAGra Foods, Inc, and its subsidiary Alexia Food Inc. The lawsuit alleged that the companies engaged in misleading advertising and false claims on the packaging of its potato products, specifically, that the potato products were ?natural? even though they contain an artificial chemical to prevent discoloration. Specifically, the plaintiffs allege Alexia cannot claim its potato products are ?all natural? when they contain the chemical disodium dihydrogen pyrophosphate (DDP). DDP, a chemical preservative that prevents the company?s potato products from turning brown, is registered with the Chemical Abstracts Service. The proposed settlement, approved by US district court judge Phyllis Hamilton, would see ConAgra create a settlement fund and establish a separate voucher fund worth $700,000. ConAgra has agreed to pay $2.5 million into the cash settlement fund, and to reformulate the Alexia potato products so that the ?all natural? label will be accurate. Eligible class members include customers who had purchased the following Alexia potato products since December 6, 2007: ?Sauté Reds,? ?Mashed Potatoes Yukon Gold Potatoes & Sea Salt,? ?Mashed Potatoes Red Potatoes with Garlic & Parmesan,? ?Waffle Fries,? ?Harvest Sauté,? ?Italian Sauté,? ?Sauté Sweets? or ?Potato Bites.? The final settlement hearing for the ConAgra consumer fraud lawsuit, entitled In Re Alexia Foods Inc. Litigation, Case No. 4:11-cv-06119-PJH, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, is scheduled for November 27. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in the form to the right.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/17495/conagra-alexia-potato-products-consumer-fraud.html?ref=rss

November 09 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Blackberry Limited 401(k) / Erisa Lawsuit

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> BlackBerry Limited BlackBerry Limited BBRY 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit BlackBerry Limited has been accused of securities fraud. If you are a current or former employee or are a member of any of BlackBerry Limited investment plans or profit sharing retirement plans you may be included in this possible BlackBerry Limited 401(k) or Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action. If you purchased or held BlackBerry Limited stock in one of those plans during the periods Sep-27-12 to Sep-20-13, you may have a claim. Under ERISA, BlackBerry Limited employees can file a lawsuit against the company for putting stock options at risk. BlackBerry Limited employees have a claim if they can prove their employer violated its fiduciary duty to its employees. Fiduciary duty refers to a company's responsibility to the people who invest in it. If an employer puts the company's interest ahead of the investors', it has Lawyer Directory broken its fiduciary duty. A fiduciary is a person that exercises discretion over the management of plan assets or exercises discretionary control over the administration of the plan. ERISA is a federal law that sets minimum standards for pension and health plans set up by private businesses. ERISA was designed to protect people who participate in employee benefit plans, including employees with stock options in a company. Stock options are a form of compensation in which employees are given the opportunity to purchase shares of the company stock at a certain price. BlackBerry Limited 401(k) / ERISA Legal Help If you have suffered from BlackBerry Limited 401(k) plan losses, you may qualify for damages or remedies that may be awarded in a possible BlackBerry Limited ERISA class action lawsuit. Please click the link below to submit your complaint and we will have a lawyer review your ERISA complaint.If you are NOT a current or former employee of this company, please use this form to register your complaint. Thank you.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/blackberry-limited-bbry-securities-erisa.html?ref=rss

November 07 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Stryker Triathlon Knee Implant Personal Injury And Defective Products Lawsuits

What are you looking for? Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Stryker Triathlon Knee Implant Injury using Shapematch Cutting Guide Stryker ShapeMatch Cutting Guide Triathalon Knee Implant Injury Were you looking for Custom Straight Accolade Recalled by Stryker or Stryker Hip Replacment Lawsuit or Stryker Recalls Software For Knee Replacement lawsuits? Stryker, maker of the ShapeMatch Cutting Guide faces a defective product lawsuit regarding its ShapeMatch device. The Stryker ShapeMatch is used to assist with knee replacement surgery, but has reportedly caused injury to the patient, according to a defective product claim. The Stryker ShapeMatch was subject of a Class I Urgent Medical Device Recall on April 10, 2013. FREE CASE EVALUATION Send your Stryker Shapematch claim to a Lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation. Stryker ShapeMatch Cutting Guide The Stryker ShapeMatch Cutting Guide is a surgical device used during total knee replacement surgery to position the knee replacement components and guide bone marking before the bone is cut. According to the US FDA, ShapeMatch Cutting Guides are single-use guides used with the Triathlon Knee System. The ShapeMatch Cutting Guide was designed to allow surgeons to make smaller incisions in the patient's knee and to customize the surgery to the patient's anatomy. The patient undergoes an MRI of the knee prior to surgery and software is then used to create a three-dimensional knee model. That 3D knee model is used to determine the size and position of the knee implant, and ShapeMatch technology is then used to create customized guides to aid the surgeon in cutting bone and positioning the implant. A defective product complaint concerning the Stryker ShapeMatch, however, alleges the device was misaligned, which resulted in the knee implant being placed in the wrong position. Issues with the Stryker ShapeMatch Cutting Guide reportedly include displayed parameters on the software not matching the cutting guides that were produced and cutting guide parameters not meeting pre-operative planning parameters for surgery. These issues can result in joint instability, pain, limited mobility, and fractures and may require revision surgery. Stryker ShapeMatch Recall On April 10, 2013, Stryker issued a Class I Urgent Medical Device Recall regarding the Stryker ShapeMatch. The company recommended that patients who had knee replacement surgery that involved the ShapeMatch contact their surgeon if they experienced symptoms of problems in their knee. When it announced the recall, the FDA noted that it had received a total of 44 reports?including 41 malfunctions and three temporary, medically reversible injuries?of incidents linked to the ShapeMatch. In November, 2012, Stryker Orthopaedics emailed medical professionals about issues with the cutting guides and informed those professionals that they should stop using the cutting guides until further notice. The Stryker Triathlon Knee System is not subject to the recall. Stryker Shapematch Cutting Guide Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/shapematch-cutting-guide-stryker-riathlon-knee.html?ref=rss

November 05 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Active Power, Inc 401(k) / Erisa Lawsuit

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Active Power, Inc Active Power, Inc ACPW 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit Active Power, Inc has been accused of securities fraud. If you are a current or former http://www.moreknig.com/144-newsom-narrows-district-attorney-list employee or are a member of any of Active Power, Inc investment plans or profit sharing retirement plans you may be included in this possible Active Power, Inc 401(k) or Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action. If you purchased or held Active Power, Inc stock in one of those plans during the periods Apr-30-13 to Sep-5-13, you may have a claim. Under ERISA, Active Power, Inc employees can file a lawsuit against the company for putting stock options at risk. Active Power, Inc employees have a claim if they can prove their employer violated its fiduciary duty to its employees. Fiduciary duty refers to a company's responsibility to the people who invest in it. If an employer puts the company's interest ahead of the investors', it has broken its fiduciary duty. A fiduciary is a person that exercises discretion over the management of plan assets or exercises discretionary control over the administration of the plan. ERISA is a federal law that sets minimum standards for pension and health plans set up by private businesses. ERISA was designed to protect people who participate in employee benefit plans, including employees with stock options in a company. Stock options are a form of compensation in which employees are given the opportunity to purchase shares of the company stock at a certain price. Active Power, Inc 401(k) / ERISA Legal Help If you have suffered from Active Power, Inc 401(k) plan losses, you may qualify for damages or remedies that may be awarded in a possible Active Power, Inc ERISA class action lawsuit. Please click the link below to submit your complaint and we will have a lawyer review your ERISA complaint.If you are NOT a current or former employee of this company, please use this form to register your complaint. Thank you.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/active-power-inc-acpw-securities-erisa.html?ref=rss

October 31 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Cigna Denied Disability

insuranceclaimcategoryWere you looking for Disability Insurance or LINA Insurance lawsuits? Consumers who have CIGNA insurance may have been victims of CIGNA denied disability claims, in which CIGNA is accused of violating consumer protection laws. Recently, a regulatory settlement was announced with five states, settling claims that CIGNA?s claims-handling procedures did not conform to required standards. FREE CASE EVALUATION Send your CIGNA Denied Disability claim to a Lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation. CIGNA Insurance Claims Consumers allege their long-term disability claims were not properly processed by CIGNA employees, resulting in improperly denied disability claims. Regulators in five states investigated CIGNA for allegedly denying initial and ongoing claims that should have been approved, and for terminating payments. Insurance companies are required to act in good faith when dealing with customers and policyholders. Often, though, they do not live up to this requirement. They use a variety of tactics to avoid or delay making payments to policyholders, including fighting or ignoring medical diagnoses, denying claims without carrying out a proper investigation or evaluation, claiming that necessary paperwork was not sent in time, requiring duplicate and triplicate copies of forms be filled out, and drawing out the investigation process. Unreasonably denying or delaying a claim is known as bad faith insurance, and many insurance companies have been accused of practicing bad faith insurance. CIGNA Regulatory Settlement In May 2013, CIGNA reached a regulatory settlement with five states concerning its handling of long-term disability claims. The settlement required CIGNA Group to: ? Improve its claims handling procedures; ? Establish procedures to allow the improved claims-handling procedures to be applied to previously denied claims in the states affected by the settlement; ? Undergo a two-year monitoring program; ? Pay fines and fees of more than $1.5 million. Included in the settlement were California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. Consumers in each of those states who had their claim denied or payment terminated could have their claims reevaluated. The settlement follows targeted marked conduct examinations that were undertaken by the insurance departments of Maine and Massachusetts beginning on September 15, 2009. Those examinations looked into whether CIGNA conformed to national requirements for claims-handling procedures. Among the irregularities found were not considering the opinions of independent physicians, ignoring decisions made by Social Security and not including workers compensation records in the decision-making process. As a result, CIGNA has set aside around $77 million to settle claims that were previously denied and may be overturned. Also involved in the settlement were CIGNA subsidiary companies, including Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Life Insurance Company of North America. CIGNA Denied Disability Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a Denied Disability Insurance lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/CIGNA-denied-disability.html?ref=rss

October 27 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Blackberry Limited 401(k) / Erisa Lawsuit

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> BlackBerry Limited BlackBerry Limited BBRY 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit BlackBerry Limited has been accused of securities fraud. If you are a current or former employee or are a member of any of BlackBerry Limited investment plans or profit sharing retirement plans you may be included in this possible BlackBerry Limited 401(k) or Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action. If you purchased or held BlackBerry Limited stock in one of those plans during the periods Sep-27-12 to Sep-20-13, you may have a claim. Under ERISA, BlackBerry Limited employees can file a lawsuit against the company for putting stock options at risk. BlackBerry Limited employees have a claim if they can prove their employer violated its fiduciary duty to its employees. Fiduciary duty refers to a company's responsibility to the people who invest in it. If an employer puts the company's interest ahead of the investors', it has broken its fiduciary duty. A fiduciary is a person that exercises discretion over the management of plan assets or exercises discretionary control over the administration of the plan. ERISA is a federal law that sets minimum standards for pension and health plans set up by private businesses. ERISA was designed to protect people who participate in employee benefit plans, including employees with stock options in a company. Stock options are a form of compensation in which employees are given the opportunity to purchase shares of the company stock at a certain price. BlackBerry Limited 401(k) / ERISA Legal Help If you have suffered from BlackBerry Limited 401(k) plan losses, you may qualify for damages or remedies that may be awarded in a possible BlackBerry Limited ERISA class action lawsuit. Please click the link below to submit your complaint and we will have a lawyer review your ERISA complaint.If you are NOT a current or former employee of this company, please use this form to register your complaint. Thank you.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/blackberry-limited-bbry-securities-erisa.html?ref=rss

October 24 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Family And Medical Leave Act And California Family Rights Act

calaborlawovertimeemployeemanualWhat are you looking for? Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Family and Medical Leave Act and California Family Rights Act Family and Medical Leave Act and California Family Rights Act Were you looking for Employment Law - California or Denny's Inc. lawsuits? The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is a federal law that protects the rights of eligible employees to take up to 12 weeks of work off for certain reasons related family issues. The California Family Rights Act (CFRA) is a state law designed to protect the rights of California employees who must take a leave for family or medical reasons. Employees who are denied this right or who take their leave only to find that their job has not been held may be eligible to file an employment lawsuit against their employer. FREE CASE EVALUATION Send your Family & Medical Leave claim to a Lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation. Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) The FMLA is overseen by the Department of Labor (DOL), Employment Standards Administration, Wage and Hour Division. It protects the rights of employees who have been employed for at least 12 months and worked a minimum of 1,250 hours as of the start of the FMLA leave. Eligible employees are entitled to up to 12 workweeks of paid or unpaid job-protected leave with employer-paid benefits. Reasons for taking FMLA leave: The birth, adoption or foster care placement of a child. To care for an immediate family member (spouse, child or parent) who has a serious health condition. For personal illness (must be a serious health condition) To care for a family member who suffered serious injury during active military duty. If an employee takes an FMLA leave, he or she is entitled to return to the same position he or she left or to an equivalent position, complete with equivalent pay, benefits and terms of employment. Failure to restore an employee to his or her position or an equivalent position could result in a lawsuit filed against the employer. Furthermore, the law also prohibits retaliation or discrimination against any employee who exercises his or her rights under the FMLA. The California Family Rights Act (CFRA) The CFRA is a California state law that protects the rights of employees to take time off for the following reasons: The birth of a child for purposes of bonding The placement of a child in the employee's family for adoption or foster care The serious health condition of the employee's child, parent or spouse The employee's own serious health condition. Employers who must follow the CFRA are those who do business in California and employ a minimum of 50 part-time or full-time employees. To be eligible for leave under the CFRA, the employee must be a full or part-time worker who has been with the employer for more than 12 months and worked at least 1,250 hours in the 12 months prior to the first day of the leave. CFRA leave entitles eligible employees to up to 12 workweeks in a 12-month period. When the employee returns to work he or she is entitled to the same or a comparable position as when he or she went on leave. California FMLA, CFRA Lawsuits Lawsuits alleging violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act, the California Family Rights Act, and the California Medical Leave Act have been filed against California employers. One such lawsuit, filed in 2013, alleged that a nurse who was employed at a hospital in California received harassing phone calls and demands that she return to work when she took time off to care for her mother who had undergone a total hip replacement. The plaintiff alleged that when she returned to work she was put on suspension and then fired in retaliation for taking time off work. Family or Medical Leave Violations' Legal Help If you or a loved one believe your employer has violated your Family and Medical Leave rights, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to an employment lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/family-leave-medical-leave.html?ref=rss

October 22 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Wrongful Self Storage Auctions

storageunitsarticle Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Wrongful Auction of Self Storage Units Contents Wrongful Self Storage Auctions Were you looking for Wrongful Storage Contents Auctions lawsuits? Storage companies face lawsuits alleging people who rent storage lockers from them have been subjected to wrongful storage contents auctions in which their property has been wrongfully auctioned off, in violation of state laws. These wrongful auctions involve the selling of property stored in a rented locker when the renter fails to pay. Although not all storage locker auctions are illegal, there are certain requirements that must be met before a person's property can be auctioned off. FREE CASE EVALUATION Send your Self-Storage claim to a Lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation. Storage Locker Auctions Storage locker auctions are typically held when a person has failed to pay for the use of a storage locker. Self-storage companies might respond by refusing to allow the person access to the locker or by auctioning off the contents of the locker. When property is auctioned without the person's knowledge it falls under conversion, which refers to the illegal taking of someone's personal property without that person's consent. When property from a storage locker is auctioned off, it is often at a profit to the storage company. In other words, the auction company makes more off the auction than was owed on the storage locker. Consumers have complained that their property has been auctioned off without their knowledge. State laws, such as the California Self Storage Act, require self-storage companies http://www.kiwibox.com/sheldontssu/blog/entry/110275867/new-filml-a-stats-show-filming-up-9-5-in-southern-califor/?pPage=0 to meet certain conditions before a person's property is auctioned. These conditions include sending two separate notice letters prior to denying a person access to a storage locker or the property contained within. Furthermore, some consumers allege they failed to make payments due to mitigating circumstances or that when they tried to contact the storage company they were unable to reach anyone. Wrongful Auctions It is not http://www.legaltechnologyfirm.com/128-effective-internet-marketing-for-lawyers-seo-for-law-firms illegal for a storage facility to auction a person's items if that person has failed to pay rent on a storage locker. There are, however, certain conditions that must be met before that auction is held. Failure to meet those requirements could result in a lawsuit against the storage facility, regardless of if the failure was intentional or an accident, such as when the wrong storage unit is auctioned off. Conversion complaints can result in punitive damages awarded to the plaintiff. Lawsuits have been filed against storage companies alleging storage locker renters had their possessions wrongfully auctioned off. Wrongful Self-Storage Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/self-storage-auction.html?ref=rss

October 20 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Specialty Compounding Recalls Medications Due To Possible Bacterial Infection

What are you looking for? Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Specialty Compounding Recalls Medications due to Possible Bacterial Infection Specialty Compounding Recalls Medications due to Possible Bacterial Infection Cedar Park, TX: Specialty Compounding, LLC, a subsidiary of Peoples Pharmacy Inc., is voluntarily recalling all lots of sterile medications within expiry. The recall was initiated after reports of bacterial infection affecting 15 patients at two Texas hospitals, Corpus Christi Medical Center Doctors Regional and Corpus Christi Medical Center Bay Area, whose treatment included IV http://prolawpress.com/blog/is-your-website-a-247-cheap-suit/ infusions of calcium gluconate from Specialty Compounding. There is a potential association between the infections and the medication at this time. If there is microbial contamination in products intended to be sterile, patients are at risk of serious infections which may be life threatening. The recall applies to all unexpired sterile compounded products dispensed since May 9, 2013, including all strengths and dosage forms. Recalled products were distributed directly to hospitals and physician offices in Texas. Recalled products were also sent directly to patients located nationwide with the exception of North Carolina. This recall is being conducted with the knowledge of the US Food and Drug Administration. Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/specialty-compounding-recalls-medications-due-to.html?ref=rss

October 16 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Oxyelite Pro Linked To Acute Hepatitis Fda Warns

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> OxyElite Pro Linked to Acute Hepatitis FDA Warns OxyElite Pro Linked to Acute Hepatitis FDA Warns Please click here for a free evaluation of your OxyElite Pro Linked to Acute Hepatitis FDA Warns Santa Barbara County Lawyer claim Washington, DC: The Food and Drug http://www.legaltechnologyfirm.com/138-peyton-manning-why-i-want-to-coach-lawyers-with-his-desire-to-succeed-2 Administration (FDA), along with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Hawaii Department of Health (DOH), are investigating a growing number of reports of acute non-viral hepatitis in Hawaii. The Hawaii DOH has reported that 24 of these cases share a common link to a dietary supplement product labeled as OxyElite Pro. OxyElite Pro is distributed by USPlabs LLC of Dallas, Texas, and is sold nation-wide through a wide range of distribution channels, including the internet and retail stores that sell dietary supplements. There have been 29 cases of acute non-viral hepatitis with an unknown cause identified in the state of Hawaii. Eleven of the 29 cases have been hospitalized with acute hepatitis, two cases have received liver transplants and one person has died. CDC is also looking at other cases of liver injury nationwide that may be related. The epidemiological investigation is being conducted by the Hawaii DOH and the CDC. As part of FDA?s associated investigation, the agency is reviewing the medical records and histories of patients identified by the Hawaii DOH. The FDA is also analyzing the composition of product samples that have been collected from some of these patients. Additionally, the FDA is inspecting the facilities involved in manufacturing the product and reviewing production and product distribution records. Because USPlabs LLC has informed FDA that it believes counterfeit versions of OxyElite Pro are being marketed in the US and have been on the US market for some time, FDA is also investigating whether counterfeit product is related to any of the cases of acute hepatitis. Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/oxyelite-pro-linked-to-acute-hepatitis-fda-warns.html?ref=rss

October 14 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Blacberry Ltd 401(k) / Erisa Lawsuit

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Blacberry Ltd Blacberry Ltd BB 401(k) / ERISA Lawsuit Blacberry Ltd has been accused of securities fraud. If you are a current or former employee or are a member of any of Blacberry Ltd investment plans or profit sharing retirement plans you may be included in this possible Blacberry Ltd 401(k) or Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action. If you purchased or held Blacberry Ltd stock in one of those plans during the periods Sep-27-12 to Sep-20-13, you may have a claim. Under ERISA, Blacberry Ltd employees can file a lawsuit against the San Luis Obispo County Lawyer company for putting stock options at risk. Blacberry Ltd employees have a claim if they can prove their employer violated its fiduciary duty to its employees. Fiduciary duty refers to a company's responsibility to the people who invest in it. If an employer puts the company's interest ahead of the investors', it has broken its fiduciary duty. A fiduciary is a person that exercises discretion over the management of plan assets or exercises discretionary control over the administration of the plan. ERISA is a federal law that sets minimum standards for pension and health plans set up by private businesses. ERISA was designed to protect people who participate in employee benefit plans, including employees with stock options in a company. Stock options are a form of compensation in which employees are given the opportunity to purchase shares of the company stock at a certain price. Blacberry Ltd 401(k) / ERISA Legal Help If you have suffered from Blacberry Ltd 401(k) plan losses, you may qualify for damages or remedies that may be awarded in a possible Blacberry Ltd ERISA class action lawsuit. Please click the link below to submit your complaint and we will have a lawyer review your ERISA complaint.If you are NOT a current or former employee of this company, please use this form to register your complaint. Thank you.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/blacberry-ltd-bb-securities-erisa.html?ref=rss

October 12 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Cigna Denied Disability

insuranceclaimcategoryWere you looking for Disability Insurance or LINA Insurance lawsuits? Consumers who have CIGNA insurance may have been victim of CIGNA denied disability claims, in which CIGNA is accused of violating consumer protection laws. Recently, a regulatory settlement was announced with five states, settling claims that CIGNA's claims-handling procedures did not conform to required standards. FREE CASE EVALUATION Send your CIGNA Denied Disability claim to a Lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation. CIGNA Insurance Claims Consumers allege their long-term disability claims were not properly processed by http://frontpageworlddirectory.com/california-personal-injury-lawyer-jonathan-w-birdt-joins-lawyer-central-attorney-directory-2/ CIGNA employees, resulting in improperly denied disability claims. Regulators in five states investigated CIGNA for allegedly denying initial and ongoing claims that should have been approved and for terminating payments. Insurance companies are required to act in good faith when dealing with customers and policyholders. Often, though, they do not live up to this requirement. They use a variety of tactics to avoid or delay making payments to policyholders, including fighting or ignoring medical diagnoses, denying claims without carrying out a proper investigation or evaluation, claiming that necessary paperwork was not sent in time, requiring duplicate and triplicate copies of forms be filled out and drawing out the investigation process. Unreasonably denying or delaying a claim is known as bad faith insurance, and many insurance companies have been accused of practicing bad faith insurance. CIGNA Regulatory Settlement In May 2013, CIGNA reached a regulatory settlement with five states concerning its handling of long-term disability claims. The settlement required CIGNA Group to: ? Improve its claims handling procedures; ? Establish procedures to allow the improved claims-handling procedures to be applied to previously denied claims in the states affected by the settlement; ? Undergo a two-year monitoring program; ? original site Pay fines and fees of more than $1.5 million. Included in the settlement were California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. Consumers in each of those states who had their claim denied or payment terminated could have their claims reevaluated. The settlement follows targeted marked conduct examination that were undertaken by the insurance departments of Maine and Massachusetts beginning on September 15, 2009. Those examinations looked into whether CIGNA conformed to national requirements for claims-handling procedures. Among the irregularities found were not considering the opinions of independent physicians, ignoring decisions made by Social Security and not including workers compensation records in the decision-making process. As a result, CIGNA has set aside around $77 million to settle claims that were previously denied and may be overturned. Also involved in the settlement were CIGNA subsidiary companies, including Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Life Insurance Company of North America. CIGNA Denied Disability Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a Denied Disability Insurance lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/CIGNA-denied-disability.html?ref=rss

October 07 2013

cornellncwd

Settlement: $9.9m Awarded In Amusement Park Accident Lawsuit

What are you looking for? Home Page >> Settlements >> $9.9M Awarded in Amusement Park Accident Lawsuit $9.9M Awarded in Amusement Park Accident Lawsuit Please click here for a free evaluation of your claim Horry County, SC A $9.9 million settlement has been awarded in an amusement park accident lawsuit brought by a woman who suffered traumatic brain injury when she fell from a ride. The lawsuit alleged that the defendant?s gross negligence proximately caused the plaintiff to suffer traumatic brain injury. According to the lawsuit, the 44-year-old plaintiff fell from one of the rides owned and operated by http://www.yourstatelaws.info/126-attorney-advertising-rules the defendant, when the ride went into sudden deceleration. Several hours later, while at home, the plaintiff became nauseous, dizzy and began vomiting and losing neurologic functioning. Her husband rushed her to the local hospital where she underwent an emergency craniotomy. It was later determined that the plaintiff had suffered an intracranial hemorrhage when she fell from the ride earlier that day. The long term results of the traumatic brain injury included an epilepsy seizure disorder, as well as left-sided hemiparesis and facial palsy. The plaintiff and her husband sued the recreational amusement company for negligence, arguing overall that the reckless operation of the ride proximately caused the plaintiff to fall. Specifically, they alleged and were able to prove that the ride was being operated at twice the manufacturer?s recommended speed of 15 miles per hour. The also provided post-injury measurements of the ride being consistently operated at a speed in excess of 30 miles per hour. Additionally, the couple challenged the enforceability of the defendant?s liability waiver, suggesting it was ambiguous because its definition of ?released activities? did not include the particular ride on which plaintiff was injured. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/17460/9-9m-awarded-in-amusement-park-accident-lawsuit.html?ref=rss

October 06 2013

cornellncwd

Settlement: $9.9m Awarded In Amusement Park Accident Lawsuit

What are you looking for? Home http://www.moreknig.com/87-legal-business-development-youre-never-too-old-to-chase-your-dreams Page >> Settlements >> $9.9M Awarded in Amusement Park Accident Lawsuit $9.9M Awarded in Amusement Park Accident Lawsuit Please click here for a free evaluation of your claim Horry County, SC A $9.9 million settlement has been awarded in an amusement park accident lawsuit brought by a woman who suffered traumatic brain injury when she fell from a ride. The lawsuit alleged that the defendant?s gross negligence proximately caused the plaintiff to suffer traumatic brain injury. According to the lawsuit, the 44-year-old plaintiff fell from one of the rides owned and operated by the defendant, when the ride went into sudden deceleration. Several hours later, while at home, the plaintiff became nauseous, dizzy and began vomiting and losing neurologic functioning. Her husband rushed her to the local hospital where she underwent an emergency craniotomy. It was later determined that the plaintiff had suffered an intracranial hemorrhage when she fell from the ride earlier that day. The long term results of the traumatic brain injury included an epilepsy seizure disorder, as well as left-sided hemiparesis and facial palsy. The plaintiff and her husband sued the recreational amusement company for negligence, arguing overall that the reckless operation of the ride proximately caused the plaintiff to fall. Specifically, they alleged and were able to prove that the ride was being operated at twice the manufacturer?s recommended speed of 15 miles per hour. The also provided post-injury measurements of the ride being consistently operated at a speed in excess of 30 miles per hour. Additionally, the couple challenged the enforceability of the defendant?s liability waiver, suggesting it was ambiguous because its definition of ?released activities? did not include the particular ride on which plaintiff was injured. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/17460/9-9m-awarded-in-amusement-park-accident-lawsuit.html?ref=rss

October 04 2013

cornellncwd

Potential Lawsuit: Stryker Triathlon Knee Implant Personal Injury And Defective Products Lawsuits

Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Stryker Triathlon Knee Implant Personal Injury Stryker Triathlon Knee Implant Personal Injury and Defective Products Lawsuits Please click here for a free evaluation of your Stryker Triathlon Knee Implant Personal Injury claim New Orleans, LA: Stryker, the manufacturer of the ShapeMatch Cutting Guide, is a facing the first of what could learn more be many defective products lawsuits related to the Stryker Triathlon Knee Implant. The ShapeMatch Cutting Guides, manufactured by Stryker Orthopaedics, a Division of Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation, are single-use, disposable, cutting guides. They are intended to be used as surgical instrumentation to assist in the positioning of total knee replacement (arthroplasty) components intra-operatively and in guiding the marking of bone before cutting. The defective products lawsuit alleges a Stryker ShapeMatch Cutting Guide was used to position a total knee replacement in Plaintiff?s body and misaligned, causing the knee replacement to be implanted in the wrong position. According to the lawsuit, the parameters of the manufactured cutting guides did not meet the surgeon?s pre-operative planning parameters entered via web application. When the parameters were manually edited to compensate for a defect in the existing software, the edits resulted in cutting guides ranges that are not cleared by the FDA. Additionally, Stryker Orthopaedics determined that another software defect resulted in the displayed parameters (e.g. depth of resection, angle of cut) not matching the cutting guides produced. This may result in serious adverse health consequences including joint instability, fracture, need for revision surgery and chronic pain and limitations of mobility. On April 10, 2013, Stryker issued a Class I Urgent Medical Device Recall. Stryker is recommending patients who had knee replacement surgery in which ShapeMatch Cutting Guides were used and who are experiencing symptoms to contact their surgeon. The plaintiffs? alleged injuries include pain, instability and the probable necessity for a second knee replacement surgery. The past decade has seen an exponential increase in hip and knee replacements and SoCalLawSupport.com with it, Stryker hip and knee replacements. With more and more baby boomers approaching an older age, hip and knee replacement surgery is becoming more common--as are hip and knee replacement complaints, with thousands of patients having filed a hip replacement lawsuit or a knee replacement lawsuit, claiming the medical devices are defective. Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/shapematch-cutting-guide-stryker-riathlon-knee.html?ref=rss
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl